Taylor Scott Amarel

Experienced developer and technologist with over a decade of expertise in diverse technical roles. Skilled in data engineering, analytics, automation, data integration, and machine learning to drive innovative solutions.

Categories

Implementing a Modern Data Engineering Stack: Strategies for Scalability, Reliability, and Cost Optimization

The Rise of the Modern Data Engineering Stack

In today’s data-driven world, organizations are increasingly reliant on their ability to collect, process, and analyze vast amounts of information. A modern data engineering stack is the foundation for unlocking the value hidden within this data, transforming raw information into actionable insights that drive strategic decision-making. The convergence of cloud computing, big data technologies, and sophisticated data science techniques has revolutionized how businesses operate, making a robust data pipeline an indispensable asset. Data engineering, therefore, has emerged as a critical discipline, bridging the gap between data sources and data consumers.

This evolution demands a modern data engineering stack capable of handling the velocity, variety, and volume of contemporary data. However, building and maintaining such a stack presents significant challenges, including ensuring scalability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. Building a modern data engineering stack necessitates careful consideration of various factors, including the specific needs of the organization, the types of data being processed, and the available resources. Scalability is paramount, as the stack must be able to handle increasing data volumes and user demands without compromising performance.

Reliability is equally critical, as data pipelines must be resilient to failures and ensure data quality throughout the entire process. Cost optimization is also a key concern, as cloud-based data infrastructure can quickly become expensive if not managed effectively. Strategies such as right-sizing cloud resources, utilizing spot instances, and implementing data lifecycle management policies are essential for controlling costs. Furthermore, adopting DevOps principles and practices, including infrastructure-as-code (IaC) and CI/CD, is crucial for automating deployments and ensuring consistency across environments.

This is especially important in complex ecosystems involving AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the key components, strategies, and best practices for implementing a modern data engineering stack that meets the demands of today’s businesses. We will delve into the essential elements of the stack, including cloud storage solutions, data processing frameworks like Apache Spark and Apache Flink, and orchestration tools like Apache Airflow. We will also explore the importance of automated testing and CI/CD for ensuring data pipeline reliability, as well as strategies for optimizing costs in cloud-based environments. Real-world examples, such as Uber’s big data migration to GCP and real-time fraud detection systems, will illustrate the practical application of these concepts. By addressing potential pitfalls and providing actionable guidance, this guide aims to empower data engineers and organizations to build robust, scalable, and cost-effective data infrastructure that unlocks the full potential of their data.

Key Components of a Modern Data Engineering Stack

The modern data engineering stack comprises several essential components, each playing a crucial role in the data pipeline, transforming raw information into actionable insights. At its foundation lies robust Cloud Storage, exemplified by services like Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Blob Storage. These scalable and cost-effective solutions handle massive datasets, often petabytes in size, forming the data lake or data warehouse. The choice of storage solution often dictates downstream processing options and impacts overall cost optimization.

For instance, organizations leveraging AWS might favor S3 due to its seamless integration with other AWS services, while those prioritizing open-source compatibility might lean towards solutions like Apache Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), though increasingly, cloud-native object stores are becoming the standard. Data Processing Frameworks are the workhorses of the modern data engineering stack. Apache Spark, with its in-memory processing capabilities, remains a popular choice for both batch and stream processing, particularly for complex transformations and machine learning workloads.

Apache Flink excels in real-time stream processing scenarios, offering low latency and high throughput, essential for applications like fraud detection and real-time analytics. Google Cloud Dataflow provides a serverless, auto-scaling option, simplifying the management of data processing pipelines. Selecting the right framework depends on factors such as data volume, velocity, variety, and the specific analytical needs of the organization. The rise of serverless options like Dataflow reflects a broader trend towards abstracting away infrastructure management, allowing data engineering teams to focus on building and optimizing data pipelines.

Orchestration Tools are essential for managing the complexity of modern data pipelines. Apache Airflow, Prefect, and Dagster provide platforms for scheduling, monitoring, and managing data workflows, ensuring that data is processed in the correct order and that dependencies are met. These tools enable data engineers to define complex data pipelines as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), providing a clear and auditable representation of the data flow. Effective orchestration is crucial for ensuring data reliability and preventing data quality issues.

Furthermore, the integration of orchestration tools with infrastructure-as-code (IaC) practices allows for the automated deployment and management of data pipelines, promoting DevOps principles within data engineering teams. Finally, Data Quality Monitoring tools, such as Great Expectations and Deequ, are critical for ensuring data accuracy and consistency throughout the data pipeline. These tools enable data engineers to define and enforce data quality rules, providing early detection of data anomalies and preventing data corruption. Integrating data quality checks into the CI/CD pipeline ensures that data quality is continuously monitored and improved. The cost of poor data quality can be significant, leading to inaccurate insights and flawed decision-making. By investing in data quality monitoring, organizations can improve the reliability of their data and the trustworthiness of their analytical results. Uber’s big data migration to GCP, for example, highlighted the importance of data quality checks during the migration process to ensure data integrity.

Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) for Data Engineering

Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) is a critical practice for managing and provisioning data infrastructure, particularly within modern data engineering stacks. Tools like Terraform, AWS CloudFormation, and Azure Resource Manager allow data engineers to define infrastructure in code, enabling version control, automation, and repeatability. This approach ensures consistency across environments (development, testing, production) and significantly simplifies infrastructure management. For example, instead of manually configuring virtual machines, network settings, and storage volumes through a cloud provider’s console, data engineers can define these resources in a declarative configuration file.

This not only speeds up the deployment process but also reduces the risk of human error, a significant concern when dealing with complex big data pipelines. IaC directly addresses the challenges of scalability, reliability, and cost optimization in cloud computing environments. Consider a data pipeline built on Apache Spark and orchestrated by Apache Airflow. As data volumes grow, the Spark cluster needs to scale dynamically. With IaC, this scaling can be automated based on predefined metrics, ensuring that the data pipeline can handle increasing workloads without manual intervention.

Furthermore, IaC facilitates the creation of disaster recovery strategies by allowing for the rapid deployment of identical infrastructure in a different region, enhancing overall system reliability. By using Infrastructure as Code, organizations can manage cloud resources more efficiently, reducing costs associated with over-provisioning and manual configuration. Moreover, IaC is deeply intertwined with DevOps principles and CI/CD pipelines for data engineering. Changes to infrastructure can be treated like any other code change, subjected to automated testing and peer review before being deployed to production.

This enables faster iteration cycles and reduces the risk of introducing errors into the data infrastructure. For instance, automated testing can verify that newly provisioned resources meet security and compliance requirements before they are made available to the data pipeline. The Uber bigdata migration gcp case study highlights the importance of IaC in managing large-scale infrastructure changes. By embracing IaC, data engineering teams can achieve greater agility, improve data quality, and reduce operational overhead, ultimately enabling them to deliver more value to the business. Maxis’s partnership with Nokia to modernize its data center infrastructure underscores the importance of robust and scalable infrastructure in today’s data-intensive landscape. IaC facilitates such modernization efforts by providing a standardized and automated way to manage infrastructure resources.

Automated Testing and CI/CD for Data Pipelines

Automated testing is essential for ensuring the reliability and accuracy of data pipelines, a cornerstone of modern data engineering. Unit tests validate individual components, ensuring each function or module performs as expected. Integration tests verify the interaction between different parts of the data pipeline, such as the connection between an Apache Spark job and a data warehouse like Snowflake. Data quality tests, often overlooked, are crucial for preventing data corruption and ensuring the integrity of insights derived from big data.

Tools like pytest provide a robust framework for writing and executing these tests, while Great Expectations offers a declarative approach to data quality testing, allowing data engineers to define and enforce data quality rules. These automated checks provide early detection of errors, preventing faulty data from propagating through the system and impacting downstream data science or machine learning models. Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipelines automate the build, test, and deployment of data engineering code, significantly accelerating iteration cycles and reducing the risk of manual errors.

In the context of cloud computing, this often involves automating the deployment of infrastructure-as-code (IaC) defined using tools like Terraform or CloudFormation, ensuring that the data pipeline is deployed consistently across different environments (development, staging, production). For example, a CI/CD pipeline might automatically trigger a series of tests whenever a data engineer commits changes to a Git repository. If all tests pass, the pipeline could then automatically deploy the updated code to a staging environment on AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud for further validation before deploying to production.

This automated process streamlines the development lifecycle and minimizes the potential for human error, contributing to greater scalability and reliability. DevOps principles are increasingly relevant in data engineering, fostering collaboration between development and operations teams to improve efficiency and reliability. This collaborative approach breaks down traditional silos, enabling faster feedback loops and quicker resolution of issues. Consider a scenario where a data scientist discovers a data quality issue affecting a machine learning model. With a strong DevOps culture, the data scientist can quickly communicate the issue to the data engineering team, who can then use automated testing and CI/CD pipelines to deploy a fix.

Furthermore, proactive monitoring and alerting systems, integrated into the CI/CD pipeline, can automatically detect and alert the team to potential problems, preventing major disruptions. Embracing DevOps practices ensures that data pipelines are not only robust but also adaptable to changing business needs, ultimately optimizing cost and improving the overall value derived from big data initiatives. The lessons learned from Uber’s big data migration to GCP highlight the importance of automation and a strong DevOps culture in managing complex data infrastructure.

Cost Optimization in Cloud-Based Data Infrastructure

Cloud-based data infrastructure offers significant advantages in terms of scalability and flexibility, but it also introduces cost management challenges that demand careful attention from data engineering teams. Strategies for optimizing costs include right-sizing cloud resources (e.g., choosing the appropriate instance types), utilizing spot instances for non-critical workloads, implementing data lifecycle management policies to archive or delete old data, and leveraging serverless computing options (e.g., AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions) for event-driven data processing. Monitoring cloud resource utilization and setting budgets are crucial for controlling costs.

Dell Technologies’ launch of infrastructure innovations for AI-ready data centers highlights the ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and reduce costs associated with data processing and storage. Beyond these foundational strategies, advanced techniques such as cost-aware data pipeline design are becoming increasingly important. This involves selecting data processing frameworks like Apache Spark or Apache Flink based not only on their performance characteristics but also on their cost profiles in the cloud environment. For example, choosing the optimal Spark configuration, including the number of executors and memory allocation, can significantly impact processing costs.

Furthermore, implementing infrastructure-as-code (IaC) with tools like Terraform allows for automated provisioning and de-provisioning of resources, ensuring that infrastructure is only active when needed, minimizing waste. According to a recent Gartner report, organizations that effectively implement cloud cost optimization strategies can reduce their cloud spending by up to 30% without impacting performance or data quality. Another critical area for cost optimization lies in optimizing data storage and retrieval. Big data often necessitates storing vast amounts of information, and different storage tiers offer varying cost-performance trade-offs.

Implementing intelligent data tiering, where frequently accessed data is stored on faster, more expensive storage and infrequently accessed data is moved to cheaper archival storage (e.g., AWS Glacier, Azure Archive Storage, Google Cloud Archive), can yield substantial cost savings. Moreover, data compression techniques can reduce storage footprint and network bandwidth costs. As data volumes continue to explode, particularly in machine learning applications, efficient data storage and retrieval strategies are paramount for maintaining cost-effective data engineering operations.

This also ties into data lifecycle management, ensuring data is retained only as long as necessary for compliance and business needs. Finally, embracing DevOps principles and automating data pipeline deployments through CI/CD pipelines can contribute to cost optimization. Automated testing ensures that changes to data pipelines don’t introduce errors that could lead to costly data corruption or processing failures. Continuous monitoring of data pipelines with tools like Prometheus and Grafana allows for early detection of performance bottlenecks and resource inefficiencies.

Furthermore, leveraging cloud provider cost management tools, such as AWS Cost Explorer or Google Cloud Billing, provides granular visibility into cloud spending and enables proactive cost control. The Uber bigdata migration gcp case study highlights how a well-planned migration and optimized infrastructure can lead to significant cost reductions in the long run. By combining these strategies, organizations can build a cost-optimized data engineering stack that delivers maximum value from their data while minimizing unnecessary expenses.

Ensuring Data Reliability Through Monitoring and Alerting

Data reliability stands as a non-negotiable cornerstone for any organization striving to be truly data-driven. It transcends mere data availability; it encompasses the accuracy, consistency, and timeliness of information, all of which are vital for informed decision-making. Robust monitoring and alerting mechanisms are indispensable for proactively detecting and addressing data quality anomalies, data pipeline failures, and performance bottlenecks that can compromise the integrity of data assets. A well-designed monitoring strategy considers key metrics such as data latency (the time it takes for data to flow through the pipeline), data completeness (ensuring all expected data arrives), data accuracy (verifying the correctness of the data), and error rates (tracking the frequency of data processing errors).

Tools like Prometheus, Grafana, Datadog, and the Elastic Stack (ELK) provide comprehensive monitoring capabilities, enabling data engineering teams to visualize these metrics and gain real-time insights into the health of their data ecosystem. These tools are frequently deployed in cloud computing environments like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, leveraging their scalability and integration with other data services. Furthermore, implementing infrastructure-as-code (IaC) principles using tools like Terraform or CloudFormation ensures that monitoring infrastructure is consistently provisioned and managed across different environments.

Effective alerting systems are crucial for translating monitoring data into actionable responses. These systems should be configured to promptly notify data engineers and DevOps teams of critical issues, such as unexpected data volume drops, sudden increases in error rates, or pipeline failures. Alerting rules should be carefully calibrated to minimize false positives while ensuring that genuine problems are addressed swiftly. Modern alerting systems often integrate with communication platforms like Slack or Microsoft Teams, enabling real-time notifications and collaborative troubleshooting.

For instance, if a data pipeline orchestrated by Apache Airflow fails, an alert can be triggered, providing details about the failure and initiating automated remediation workflows. Furthermore, integrating automated testing and CI/CD pipelines ensures that data quality checks are performed continuously, preventing faulty code from propagating to production environments. Beyond monitoring and alerting, implementing comprehensive data lineage tracking is essential for understanding the end-to-end flow of data through the data pipeline. Data lineage provides a detailed audit trail, tracing the origin of data, the transformations it undergoes, and its ultimate destination.

This capability is invaluable for identifying the root cause of data quality problems, debugging complex data pipelines, and ensuring compliance with data governance regulations. Tools like Apache Atlas and commercial solutions offer automated data lineage discovery, capturing metadata about data assets and their relationships. By visualizing data lineage, data engineering teams can quickly pinpoint the source of errors, assess the impact of data quality issues, and implement corrective actions. This is particularly critical in big data environments where data originates from diverse sources and undergoes complex transformations within frameworks like Apache Spark and Apache Hadoop. Investing in data lineage tools and practices is a key step toward ensuring data reliability and building trust in data-driven insights. The Uber bigdata migration gcp case study underscores the importance of robust monitoring and data lineage in large-scale data engineering projects, highlighting how these practices contribute to the overall success of data initiatives and cost optimization strategies.

Real-World Example: Real-Time Fraud Detection

Consider a financial services company grappling with the ever-present threat of fraud. To combat this, they need to process massive volumes of transactional data in real-time, a task perfectly suited for a modern data engineering stack. They might architect a system leveraging Apache Kafka for high-throughput data ingestion, capturing every transaction as it occurs. Apache Flink, a powerful stream processing framework, would then analyze this data on the fly, identifying suspicious patterns and anomalies indicative of fraudulent activity.

The results, enriched with contextual information, could be stored in Apache Cassandra, a highly scalable NoSQL database optimized for fast reads and writes. This entire data pipeline, from ingestion to storage, would be orchestrated by a tool like Apache Airflow, ensuring each step is executed in the correct order and with appropriate dependencies. This illustrates how different components of a modern data engineering stack, often deployed on cloud computing platforms like AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud, can be combined to solve a specific, high-stakes business problem.

Ensuring data quality is paramount in such a system. The insights derived from machine learning models trained on potentially flawed data are only as good as the data itself. Data quality monitoring tools, integrated directly into the data pipeline, would continuously assess the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of the transactional data. These tools can automatically detect anomalies, such as missing values, incorrect data types, or unexpected distributions, triggering alerts for data engineering teams to investigate and remediate.

Furthermore, automated testing, including unit tests and integration tests, should be a core element of the CI/CD pipeline, ensuring that changes to the data pipeline don’t inadvertently introduce errors or degrade data quality. Employing infrastructure-as-code principles allows for consistent and reproducible deployments of the entire fraud detection system across different environments. This real-time fraud detection system exemplifies several key principles of modern data engineering. First, it highlights the importance of scalability. The system must be able to handle increasing volumes of transactional data without performance degradation.

Second, reliability is crucial. The data pipeline must be resilient to failures and able to recover quickly from errors. Third, cost optimization is a key consideration. The financial services company needs to balance the performance and reliability requirements with the cost of operating the infrastructure. Strategies such as right-sizing cloud resources and utilizing spot instances can help to reduce costs without compromising performance. Moreover, monitoring the entire stack with tools like Prometheus and Grafana allows for proactive identification of bottlenecks and potential issues, ensuring the continued effectiveness of the fraud detection system. This approach transforms big data challenges into opportunities for enhanced security and customer trust.

Potential Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

A frequent misstep in data engineering projects is underestimating the multifaceted nature of data integration, a challenge that resonates deeply within the realms of big data and cloud computing. Merging data streams from disparate sources, each governed by unique formats, schemas, and quality standards, demands meticulous planning and robust tooling. This complexity is amplified when dealing with real-time data pipelines, where latency requirements necessitate efficient transformation and harmonization techniques. Data engineers must proactively address these integration hurdles by leveraging metadata management systems, data catalogs, and schema evolution strategies.

Furthermore, a deep understanding of data governance principles is crucial to ensure compliance and maintain data integrity throughout the integration process, especially when dealing with sensitive information in regulated industries. Ignoring these aspects can lead to data silos, inaccurate reporting, and ultimately, flawed decision-making, undermining the entire data-driven initiative. Neglecting data quality is another critical pitfall that can severely compromise the value derived from data science and machine learning endeavors. Poor data quality, characterized by incompleteness, inconsistency, and inaccuracy, directly translates into biased models, unreliable insights, and ultimately, poor business outcomes.

Investing in comprehensive data quality monitoring and data cleansing processes is therefore paramount. This includes implementing automated data validation rules, anomaly detection algorithms, and data lineage tracking to identify and rectify data quality issues proactively. Tools like Great Expectations and Deequ can be integrated into the data pipeline to enforce data quality constraints and provide real-time feedback on data integrity. A proactive approach to data quality is not merely a technical necessity but a strategic imperative for organizations seeking to leverage data as a competitive advantage.

Over-engineering the data pipeline, often driven by a desire for future-proof scalability, can paradoxically hinder agility and inflate costs within cloud computing environments. While scalability is a core tenet of modern data engineering, it’s crucial to avoid premature optimization and unnecessary complexity. Starting with a simple, scalable architecture and incrementally adding complexity only when demonstrably needed is a more prudent approach. This allows for faster iteration, easier maintenance, and reduced operational overhead. Embracing Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) principles with tools like Terraform or CloudFormation can help manage infrastructure complexity and ensure consistency across environments.

Furthermore, adopting a DevOps culture that emphasizes collaboration and continuous improvement can facilitate efficient resource utilization and prevent unnecessary infrastructure sprawl. By prioritizing simplicity and agility, data engineering teams can optimize cost efficiency and deliver value more rapidly. Another potential problem is a lack of automated testing and CI/CD pipelines. Without proper testing, data engineers risk deploying faulty code that can corrupt data or cause pipeline failures. Implementing unit tests, integration tests, and data quality tests within a CI/CD framework is essential for ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the data pipeline. This allows for early detection of errors and prevents data corruption from propagating to downstream systems. Tools like pytest and Jenkins can be used to automate these tests and streamline the deployment process. Furthermore, monitoring and alerting systems should be in place to detect and respond to data quality issues, pipeline failures, and performance bottlenecks in real-time. This proactive approach ensures data reliability and minimizes the impact of potential problems.

Case Study: Uber’s Big Data Migration to GCP

Uber’s big data migration to GCP stands as a compelling case study, offering invaluable insights into the complexities and rewards of modern data engineering in the cloud. The sheer scale of Uber’s data, encompassing petabytes of ride data, user behavior, and operational metrics, presented a formidable challenge. Migrating this vast volume of information while maintaining data pipeline reliability and ensuring minimal disruption to critical business functions required meticulous planning and execution. This undertaking underscores the increasing importance of robust data engineering practices when dealing with big data, especially when transitioning to cloud computing environments like Google Cloud.

The success of their migration hinged not only on selecting the right technologies but also on adopting a strategic, phased approach that minimized risk and maximized efficiency. The phased migration approach adopted by Uber highlights a best practice for large-scale data initiatives. Rather than attempting a ‘big bang’ migration, they strategically moved workloads in stages, allowing them to validate the new infrastructure and data pipelines at each step. This iterative approach enabled them to identify and address potential issues early on, ensuring data quality and minimizing downtime.

Furthermore, Uber’s emphasis on automation, particularly through infrastructure-as-code (IaC) principles, was crucial for managing the complexity of their cloud environment. By leveraging tools like Terraform, they could provision and manage their infrastructure in a repeatable and consistent manner, reducing the risk of human error and accelerating the migration process. This also allowed their data engineering teams to adopt DevOps principles, fostering collaboration and streamlining the development and deployment of data pipelines. Leveraging GCP’s managed services, such as BigQuery and Dataflow, was instrumental in simplifying data processing and reducing operational overhead for Uber.

BigQuery’s serverless architecture allowed them to analyze massive datasets without the need for extensive infrastructure management, while Dataflow provided a scalable and reliable platform for building complex data pipelines. By offloading these tasks to GCP’s managed services, Uber’s data engineering team could focus on higher-value activities, such as developing new data products and improving data quality. This shift towards cloud-native services also enabled them to optimize costs, as they only paid for the resources they consumed.

The migration also allowed Uber to improve its machine learning capabilities, using GCP’s AI platform to build and deploy more sophisticated models for tasks such as fraud detection and demand forecasting. This case study underscores the transformative potential of cloud computing for organizations seeking to unlock the full value of their big data assets, and the critical role of data engineering in making that transformation a reality. The adoption of automated testing and CI/CD pipelines further ensured the reliability and accuracy of these data-driven applications.

Conclusion: Building a Data-Driven Future

Implementing a modern data engineering stack is a journey, not a destination. It requires continuous learning, adaptation, and optimization. By focusing on scalability, reliability, cost optimization, and data quality, organizations can build a data engineering foundation that enables them to unlock the full potential of their data and gain a competitive advantage. Embracing DevOps principles, Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC), and automated testing are crucial for building and maintaining a robust and efficient data engineering stack. As technology evolves, staying informed about the latest trends and best practices is essential for ensuring the long-term success of the data engineering function.

The convergence of cloud computing and big data technologies has fundamentally reshaped the landscape of data engineering. Platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud offer a plethora of managed services that simplify the deployment and management of complex data pipelines. From scalable storage solutions like S3 and Azure Blob Storage to powerful data processing frameworks like Apache Spark and Apache Flink, the cloud provides the building blocks for constructing highly performant and cost-effective data infrastructure.

Data engineers can leverage these tools to ingest, transform, and analyze massive datasets with unprecedented speed and efficiency, accelerating the delivery of data-driven insights. Central to this evolution is the increasing importance of automation and orchestration. Tools like Apache Airflow enable data engineers to define, schedule, and monitor complex data workflows, ensuring that data pipelines run reliably and efficiently. Coupled with CI/CD practices, automated testing frameworks such as pytest and Great Expectations guarantee data quality and prevent regressions.

By embracing these principles, organizations can minimize manual intervention, reduce errors, and accelerate the delivery of new data products and features. The lessons learned from case studies like Uber’s big data migration to GCP highlight the critical role of automation in managing large-scale data engineering projects. Furthermore, the rise of machine learning has placed new demands on data engineering teams. Building and deploying machine learning models requires robust data pipelines that can handle diverse data sources, perform complex feature engineering, and ensure data quality throughout the model lifecycle. Data engineers must collaborate closely with data scientists to design and implement these pipelines, leveraging tools like Apache Hadoop and specialized cloud services to support the unique requirements of machine learning workloads. By embracing these challenges, data engineering can unlock new opportunities for innovation and drive transformative business outcomes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

*
*